[quote author=“falck”]
So again, the best way to go for the labels is to keep making high-quality releases to counter the growing perception of music as disposable “0s” and “1s”.
ahh, but what about embracing this notion of music as 0’s and 1’s? plenty of smaller labels have done well with mp3 sales. and i know plenty of people who would never in their life pay 20 dollars for a record, but would gladly pay for high quality digital files. and this is even preferable for the labels in many ways (negligible overhead, no shipping hassles)...this way the artists and labels get financial support and the fans get their music in an affordable, legitimate format - all that suffers is the (antiquated?) notion of the album as a physical art object.
now, i prefer to see vinyl records selling well, of course, but that is not so much the case these days, outside of collector circuits and die hard fans. as falck said, in response to ton’s complaint of being fanless - there is a threshold between liking something and wanting to buy it (and an even greater threshold between liking something and wanting to pay 100+ dollars for it). the assertion that one needs to procure the original album to hear the music at all leaves NO room for the casual fan.
for this scene to grow and be appreciated on a larger scale (obviously we’re not talking top 40 here), some concessions may need to be made for those who really enjoy the music, but don’t have the time or money to make collecting their primary pursuit in life.
i suppose that brings up the question - is that kind of growth or appreciation even valued by this community? does a label selling digital files violate some core principle, does that invalidate the purity and exclusivity of the music at hand?