I was going to write something long and sweeping but I have to go to work now.
So, I just wanted to address the analogy put forth way back in this topic:
that posting a digital reproduction of music on a blog and only removing it when asked is akin to breaking into a home and only leaving when asked.
I don’t think this is a particularly good analogy for what is occurring.
Maybe it would be more accurate to say that you created and sold at a reasonable rate 1000 exact REAL copies of your home in the hopes that someone would use them, and perhaps recognize YOU for doing so.
20 years later a person found a way to make a very nearly identical version of one of these homes out of cardboard. You couldn’t really use the appliances or FEEL the carpet, but you had the general sense that you were in the house when using this copy of the home.
When you discover that people are offering for free, to the 2500 people worldwide that want them, copies of this nearly indistinguishable cardboard house you ask(tell?) them to stop distributing that because it is your house.
But in fact it is not really your house, it’s a facsimile of something you decided, however foolishly, to foist upon the world of people into which you were born.
But you say, “I created the ESSENCE of that thing! I deserve total control and all rewards or consequences of that thing!”. And the only answer I can offer for that is, then why have you given it to us, and where have you been all these years?
No, in reality most of us would probably say “No problem, I understand, now that you’ve reasserted yourself to exert your rightful control, I’ll help by no longer offering these facsimiles.”
And what’s so direspectful, naive, or unreasonable about that?
:?